Apply now

After three Federal Court judges led that banks which lend for stock market investment, a Sydney barrister’s victory in margin-loan case overturned on appeal when prices fall. The appeal gave discretion to reduce the time for its clients to meet margin calls from three days to one. This is in behalf to the wording of the agreement and partly due to one of its objects was the lender’s protection against a fall in the value of the securities purchased by the borrower such as on payday loans (e.g. cash advance loan, cash advance payday loan, or online payday loan).

Ross Goodridge case is one good example of this appeal in which he was given 24 hours way back in February 2009 to meet two margin calls with a total of $190, 201. But he failed and so his entire holding of Macquarie Country Wide Trust units was sold for $647, 121 over a week. Mr. Goodridge sued Macquarie and Leveraged Equities and claimed that his units were not sold properly at the bottom of the market and that the company had no power to do such thing because its purchase of the loan business had not been validly executed. Last year, Mr. Goodrige won back his units but few days ago, he was ordered to return them, pay the $58,572 balance on his margin loan and should pay the costs of Macquarie and Leveraged Equities which fielded separate legal teams.

Justice Margaret Stone said that if the obscure and ambiguous contract had been competently hauled, the case and the appeal might have been prevented. She, together with the other judges criticized the poor drafting on agreement of the loan. This agreement did not contain the clarity of language which ought to be expected from such document, as said by both Justice Peter Jacobson and Justice Ray Finkelstein. These reasons will surely cheer up the banking sectors.

The agreement is also connected with a margin lender such as the ones who offer quick cash loan such as payday loans. All the justices agreed with a Canadian ruling which is typically imposed on a creditor.